Sunday, February 4, 2018

Resisting Happiness by Matthew Kelly


by
 
A thought-provoking book. The essential argument appears to be:

(1) God created us to be in relationship with him
(2) We're (ideally?) happy only if we're pursuing our created purpose
-------
Therefore, if we resist pursuing a relationship with God, then we are "resisting happiness"

I'm not convinced that the matter is as cut-and-dried as Mr. Kelly presents it. Nonetheless, I think a lot could be learned by spelling out his specific mistake(s). For that reason, I'll re-read this book at some point. I disagreed with it, but I enjoyed it.

Sunday, January 28, 2018

Ten Things I Hate about You by David Levithan


by
 
If I be waspish, best beware my sting -- Taming of the Shrew (Act II: scene i)

This little paperback, made into a movie in 1999, retells Shakespeare's play The Taming of the Shrew as a high school drama: Cameron and Joey carry a torch for Bianca. Bianca wants a chance to date. The problem is, Daddy won't let her start dating before her older "shrew" of a sister, Kat, begins dating herself. Solution? Patrick Verona, who's willing to woo the difficult Kat...but only if he's compen$ated for the arduous job.

One thing leads to a-farcical-nother: Cameron tutors Bianca in French ("You speak French?" he's asked; "No, but I will," he vows.). But Bianca falls for the rough charms of Joey. Bianca goes on a date with Joey. Bianca falls out of "like" with Joey. Meanwhile, Patrick perseveres in his mi$$ion to move Kat's seemingly unshakable aversion to "unwashed high school miscreants." Patrick succeeds--then finds himself falling for Kat. Kat discovers Patrick's attentions were fueled by the profit motive ("Only at first!" he protests). It takes some sorting out, but all ends well--as is par for the course in a Shakespeare comedy.

This modern rendition of the drama has its charms. It slips in a couple of allusions to The Bard (Macbeth"s "Who could refrain that...in that heart [had] courage to make love known?"; and "Sweet love, renew thy force!" from Sonnet LVI.)

The story also has its occasional thought-provoking observations: There are two kinds of looking--one respectful, "daring not touch" the apple of one's eye, and the other "that's like slurping a Coke" (page 12). There are two kinds of changes in life: "sometimes...it's totally out of your control....Sometimes, though, you have a say in where your life is going to go" (page 96). There are two kinds of kisses between lovers: a kiss to "shut up" what one's Beloved is saying, and another kiss "because [they] understand" (page 105).

I enjoyed this book: it gave me what I expected--I wanted lightly funny, with touches of teenage angst and earnestness. And that's what I got. It's worth checking out. Students might find it fun to draw out more parallels between this story and the Shakespearean original. And parallels there always are--for while times may change, people, and the love between them, never change. And since "the course of true love never did run smooth", this means there will always be some comedy in the flowering of serious love.

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer by C.S. Lewis


by
 
 In this brief collection of letters, C.S. Lewis discusses a rainbow of issues concerning all kinds of prayer: prayers of adoration, prayers of repentance, prayers of petition. Since these are only letters, Lewis's views on these matters are often sketchy, but deeply suggestive. (I think it would be quite interesting to discuss this book with a Christian reading group.)

A few bits I hope to remember from this slim volume:

1) "Does not every movement in the Passion write large some common element in the sufferings of our race? First, the prayer of anguish; not granted. Then He turns to His friends. They are asleep--as ours...are so often, or busy, or away, or preoccupied. Then He faces the Church....It condemns him....There is the State [which washes its hands of His plight]...There is...an appeal to the People [He had served and blessed]...But they have become over-night...a murderous rabble, shouting for His blood. There is, then, nothing left but God. [But] to God, [Christ's] last words are 'Why hast thou forsaken me [too]?'" (page 43) It might be interesting to discuss this passage in connection with I Corinthians 10:13.

2) I very much like Lewis's gloss on the Lord's Prayer (Matt. 6:9-13). Especially, regarding thy will be done: "...a great deal of it is to be done by God's creatures, including me. The petition, then, is not merely that I may patiently suffer God's will but also that I may vigorously do it. I must be an agent as well as a patient." (pages 25-26) And, yes indeed, this seems true--even in the context of the rest of the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5-7). After all, it's God's will that I not think wrathful nor lustful thoughts, nor be self-seeking in my prayer and giving. For myself, I certainly need a prayer to have the strength to adhere to those parts of God's will! I hope I can always remember Lewis's understanding of that: "Thy will be done--by me."

3) I wonder about Lewis's claim that a true "religion" must contain elements of both: (a) the miraculous ("magical" is his word, meaning an "objective efficacy which cannot be further analyzed [explained?]"); and (b) the moral ("ethical" is his word). Where do you draw the line? Lewis wisely shrugs: "I am not going to lay down rules as to the share--quantitatively considered--which the magical should have in anyone's religious life. Individual differences may be permissible. What I insist on is that it can never be reduced to zero. If it is, what remains is only morality, or culture, or philosophy." (page 104)

As one can guess, I found this book challenging and thought-provoking. I could certainly see myself re-reading it (as I think I'd need to, to fully grasp all of Lewis's remarks on prayer).

Sunday, March 12, 2017

Review of Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for Overcoming Bad Habits by James O. Prochaska, John C. Norcross , Carlo C. DiClemente


How do people change? For generations, folk wisdom told us that changing an undesirable behvaior was a simple matter of "willpower."

But beginning in the 1980s, psychologists James Prochaska and Carlo DiClemente began research which would challenge the "simple willpower" model of change:

"Many people we have interviewed first tell us, 'I just woke up one morning and quit [smoking].' [But w]hen we ask more detailed questions, they begin to remember....[1] They remember the weeks prior to that fateful morning, when perhaps they switched brands and became increasingly disgusted with smoking. [2] They remember earlier attempts to quit smoking. [3] They remember when they avoided people and the places that were filled with smoke during the two weeks after quitting. [4] They remember enlisting the aid of several friends at work by announcing their attempt to quit smoking" (page 210).

In short, Prochaska and colleagues realized that change is not a simple event, but a process, including the above techniques of [1] Preparation [2] Relapse and Renewed Resolution [3] Avoiding Tempting Environments and [4] Making one's Change-Commitment Public and tapping Helping Relationships to increase one's chance at success.

In the end, Prochaska and colleagues finally modeled change as a Five-Stage Process. They devote a chapter to each such stage in this book:

Chapter 4: Precontemplation: where a person isn't even considering changing a behavior, is in denial about it.

Chapter 5: Contemplation: where a person begins to be receptive to information about their problematic behavior, begins thinking about changing it...maybe in the next six months.

Chapter 6: Preparation: where a person makes the commitment to change, sets a date, and creates an "action plan" for changing.

Chapter 7: Action: where the person puts their Action Plan into gear, usually spending their first six months meeting a host of basic temptations, challenges, and distresses of actually changing their problematic behavior.

Chapter 8: Maintenance: where the plan is in place. The person tries to maintain their new/changed way of life. While temptations to stray are fewer at this point, the person has to be ready for sudden surprises which might knock them off the beam.

Of course, even the best-made plans can go awry. ("Everyone has a plan," boxers often say, "until you get punched in the face.") In fact, most people fall off the beam the first time they try to change some behavior (smoking, drinking, overeating, etc.). For this reason, Prochaska and colleagues added the stage of "Relapse/Recycling" to their model (Chapter 9). Happily, they've found that, even when people lapse in their change-program, many of them "recycle": they (1) try to learn from their lapse and then (2) return to their change-commitment, this time a bit wiser than before.

In this book, Prochaska et al describe each of the change-stages in detail, pointing out that certain coping-techniques are more appropriate to different stages of change. For example, while book-learning ("consciousness raising") is very helpful in the Contemplation stage, Action and Maintenance require more active coping techniques--such as learning Relaxation, or including an Exercise regimen, or learning to "talk back" to tempting thoughts (nicely summarized on page 54).

Even more fascinating, Prochaska et al point out (page 26) that different styles of psychotherapy/counseling might be more helpful to people at different stages of change. Contemplators, for instance, can profit greatly from traditional analysis (Freudian/Jungian/Gestalt/Transactional/etc). On the other hand, people at the Action/Maintenance stages might profit better from more behavior-and-relationship based therapies (Behaviorism/Cognitive/Humanistic/Existential Counseling).

But most important, this book aims to be a very detailed guide for readers who not only want to learn the psychology of change, but also want to apply this model to their own lives. For this reason, Prochaska et al (1) Walk the reader through the five stages; then (2) explain the coping techniques most helpful to each stage, (3) give real-life examples of people at each stage and the actions they took at each stage. Finally, (4) Prochaska et al apply the Stages of Change model to specific behaviors at Chapter 10: smoking, drinking and coping with psychological (di)stress.

Of course, no book can be a panacea--change is difficult no matter how much psychology one has read. (The authors are well-aware of this, and point it out repeatedly.) But this book offers a reader an eyes-wide-open vision of how real people really change, and what kinds of preparation and specific coping skills can best ensure success in changing one's life.

 https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1939638837

Saturday, March 4, 2017

Review of Detour: My Bipolar Road Trip in 4-D by Lizzie Simon

Lizzie Simon was diagnosed as bipolar when she was 17 years old. After a few years of fits and starts, she found herself wondering what it's like to live successfully with bipolar disorder: "I have this idea," she writes, "I want to find other bipolar people like me and interview them....I want to show that people survive this illness and live full lives. I want to figure out what worked in people who are success cases, and shift people's focus away from all the media attention on destructive and violent cases" (page 41).

So Lizzie takes a road trip (as hinted at in her book's title). Along the way, she meets disappointing cases--like "Nicholas," who remains in denial about his condition, and copes with his symptoms through alcohol and drug abuse. "Everybody I interviewed for this book is diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder, between the ages of sixteen and thirty-five, on medicine, and highly functional in society" (page 209)

Lizzie grows through the course of her Road Trip. At first, she sought a "herd" of people who were "just like her" for comfort. But what she later realizes is that she had always had a "herd": "My family is, of course, the original herd. They were the herd I'd always had, and when I was done wandering, they became the herd that welcomed me back. For that I am truly blessed" (page 205)

Simon's book is studded with this and other thought-provoking insights, for instance:

"People who dedicate themselves to personal growth do grow, and they get to enjoy their work almost every day of their lives" (page 207)

"We do not share the same illness, for we each experience it differently. But we do share the same diagnosis" (page 210)

For insights like this, readers will enjoy Lizzie Simon's book. I zoomed through it in a few days--it's readable, absorbing, and insightful.
 https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1931680139

Friday, February 3, 2017

Review of Randall Balmer, Thy Kingdom Come: How the Religious Right Distorts the Faith and Threatens America: An Evangelical's Lament

Why are evangelical Christians often so politically conservative? Does Christianity/Scripture require them to be conservative? Or do they have conservative personalities, first, then adapt Christianity to fit their political position? In this book, a liberal evangelical, Randall Balmer, argues for the latter.

Balmer points out that there are three characteristics to being an "evangelical" (pages xviii-xix): 1) The importance of a "conversion experience" (see John 3:3). 2) The obligation to share the Gospel ("good news") with others (see Matthew 28:19). 3) The importance of taking the Bible "seriously" (see 2 Timothy 3:16).

In Balmer's view, the above three conditions need not entail one's becoming a political conservative. (After all, American politician William Jennings Bryan (1860-1925) was an evangelical--but also supported progressive causes and pacifism.) Rather, Balmer observes that a right-wing ideology only flows from what he describes as a self-serving "slavishly...selective literalism" when it comes to Biblical interpretation (page xviii). (Why, for instance, do conservative Christians focus so harshly on contraception and abortion, about which Scripture says little or nothing, but don't march against, say, liberalized no-fault divorce laws--especially when the Gospels present Jesus as condemning divorce? [see the Sermon on the Mount, at Matthew 5:31-32, for instance]. Why block abortion clinics and not divorce courts? Why oppose gay marriage so loudly but remain so silent concerning straight divorce? (chapter 1))

Balmer then goes on to explain how a more careful, holistic reading of the Christian scriptures engenders progressive attitudes toward poverty (see Matthew 25:40), the environment (chapter 5), public schools (chapter 3), Darwin's theory of evolution (chapter 4), and the separation of Church and State (chapter 2).

Balmer's book is a rich and thought-provoking book. He, of course, realizes that his "progressive evangelicalism" is a minority viewpoint; nonetheless, it's refreshing to see a committed Christian explain how Scripture admits of a more open ideological stance. I'd definitely read this book again--and I'm tempted to check out his book, Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory: A Journey Into the Evangelical Subculture in America, for more background on evangelicalism and American politics. 

 https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1901378688

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Review of Last Night at the Lobster by Stewart O'Nan

Today is Manny's last day managing the Red Lobster. Because they're closing it. And it's Christmas-crowded. And Manny only has a skeleton crew, since most of the staff bailed the doomed ship. And the server and greeter hate each other. And there's a party of 14 who showed up, no reservation. And it's all-you-can-eat shrimp day. And Manny still carries a torch for Jacquie, the boricua waitress he had the affair with last spring. And then the blizzard starts...

A Day in the Life of a Red Lobster. Written with all the delightful, bitter, sweet details. It details all the chaos and crises of everyday life. So in short, it's a delightful book about life--since everyday life is what Life mostly is. Would read again!
 https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1891626287